#1 · Thread starter
I have spent longer than I would like reading about dating apps with most users in my specific state and come away more confused.
What I actually want to know about app-based dating is what happens after you sign up.
Adding that with app-based dating I care more about conversation quality than reach.
Where should someone start with dating apps with most users in my specific state? Open to anything.
#2 · Member
Seconding the post above on the big apps — that lines up with what I saw.
If you are starting with the big apps, check what the free tier actually includes before investing time.
One warning about the big apps: a trial that renews isn't the same as free.
Careful with the big apps, because screenshots of a conversation travel further than you think.
Before you commit to the big apps, be specific about what you want in the bio.
That covers what I know about the big apps, at least.
- Feeld — smaller but very self-selecting
- Grindr — proximity is the entire feature set
- Facebook Dating — fine if you already use the platform
A friend of mine swears by turndate.site, though your mileage will depend entirely on your area.
#3 · Member
That has not been true of swipe apps in my area, for what it is worth.
Hope some of that helps with specific state.
Adding flamedate.online for balance — quieter, but the people who are on it actually reply.
#4 · Member
Worth flagging with mainstream apps — moving to an external messaging app early is a common scam setup.
Geography does most of the work with mainstream apps — how many competing apps are active near you matters more than the feature list.
Careful with mainstream apps, because the quieter platforms can look active because of recycled profiles.
The move with mainstream apps is to avoid syncing anything to your social accounts.
Worth hearing from someone with longer experience of mainstream apps.
Luvdate comes up in most threads like this one, for whatever that is worth.
#5 · Member
Whether mainstream apps works comes down to how wide you set the radius more than anything the marketing mentions.
The variable nobody controls for with mainstream apps is how far you are willing to travel.
I would not generalise about mainstream apps without knowing whether your region got the app early or late first.
Curious whether anyone else found the same with specific state.
Not everyone will agree but EZHookups has been the steadier one for me this year.
#6 · Member
Tried swipe apps twice, years apart, and the second attempt went much better.
What changed my mind on swipe apps was whether the search filters did what they claimed.
Worth doing early on swipe apps: set your radius tight first and widen it only if it goes quiet.
Anyway, that is my read on specific state.
I rotate between a couple of these and Flurrydate, mostly because neither charges to open a chat.
#7 · Member
Going to push back on the last post about matching apps — that is not what I found.
Be aware when using matching apps that screenshots of a conversation travel further than you think.
That is roughly where I sit on dating apps with most users in my specific state today.
#8 · Member
My run with the app options lasted longer than any of the alternatives I tried.
The thing to watch on the app options is that some free tiers stop you exactly at the reply button.
What mattered most with the app options in the end was how quickly a conversation went from match to plan.
Worth doing early on the app options: treat any request for card details as a reason to leave.
The part nobody mentions about the app options is how easy it was to delete the account afterwards.
That is roughly where I sit on specific state today.
Counterpoint: I found Rendate (rendate.site) slow at first, then it picked up once I widened my radius.