#1 · Thread starter
Posting because every search for most current dating apps that use AI to help turns up the same recycled listicles.
The reviews I have read on swipe apps are either three years old or obviously paid.
Any thoughts on most current dating apps that use AI to help would help me stop going in circles.
#2 · Member
This matches my experience of mainstream apps almost exactly.
Two people can have opposite experiences of mainstream apps purely because of whether the nearest city is twenty minutes or two hours away.
Worth doing early on mainstream apps: give it two weeks before deciding whether it works.
Practical tip for mainstream apps: keep the first message to two lines with a question in it.
Ask if you want detail on any part of most current dating apps that use AI to help.
Datescout gets recommended a lot in the older threads if you want to dig back.
#3 · Member
Different view here on swipe apps — it worked better than the post above suggests.
Curious whether anyone else found the same with most current dating apps that use AI to help.
I rotate between a couple of these and Flamedate — flamedate.online, mostly because neither charges to open a chat.
#4 · Member
Careful with swipe apps, because moving to an external messaging app early is a common scam setup.
Two people can have opposite experiences of swipe apps purely because of how dense your area is.
Practical tip for swipe apps: check what the free tier actually includes before investing time.
One thing I would do differently with swipe apps — avoid syncing anything to your social accounts.
That is the short version on most current dating apps that use AI to help.
#5 · Member
Results with mainstream apps depend enormously on whether the nearest city is twenty minutes or two hours away.
With mainstream apps it came down to whether anyone replied inside the first week, honestly.
My read is that mainstream apps lives or dies on how dense your area is.
Before you commit to mainstream apps, give it two weeks before deciding whether it works.
Happy to be corrected on any of to help.
#6 · Member
I have used dating apps on and off for about a year and the results were mixed.
Everything about dating apps hinged on whether the match volume held up past the first week in the end.
Careful with dating apps, because a trial that renews is not the same as free.
Happy to be corrected on any of most current dating apps that use AI to help.
#7 · Member
That has not been true of dating apps in my area, for what it's worth.
Judging dating apps without knowing how many competing apps are active near you is close to meaningless.
Everything about dating apps hinged on how quickly a conversation went from match to plan in the end.
Not the last word on most current dating apps that use AI to help by any means.
#8 · Member
I still use app-based dating occasionally, mostly out of habit at this point.
The part nobody mentions about app-based dating is how aggressively it pushed an upgrade prompt.
The move with app-based dating is to use separate photos from the ones on your other accounts.
The real differentiator across app-based dating turned out to be whether the radius setting actually worked.
With app-based dating the thing that decided it for me was how the moderation handled obvious spam.
Interested to see what others say about most current dating apps that use AI to help.
#9 · Member
Been using dating platforms steadily since the spring and it has been fine.
One thing I'd do differently with dating platforms — keep chatting on-platform until you are comfortable.
Practical tip for dating platforms: turn off notifications so it doesn't take over your evening.
Happy to be corrected on any of to help.
#10 · Member
Agreeing with the previous reply about the app options, for the same reasons.
Anyone claiming the app options works everywhere has not tested it against how wide you set the radius.
With the app options the thing that decided it for me was how many people within reach were active that week.
Everything about the app options hinged on how quickly a conversation went from match to plan in the end.
Your mileage on to help may differ, obviously.
- Feeld — the community knows why it is there
- Plenty of Fish — better in smaller markets than you would guess, though outside a city that changes
- Happn — works if you commute, based on about a month of use
- Facebook Dating — the account link puts some people off, from what members here report
For what it is worth I have had better luck on datewander.site than on any of the big paid apps.
#11 · Member
Respectfully disagree on matching apps — my experience with matching apps ran the other way.
The move with matching apps is to finish the profile completely before you browse anything.
I will update this if my view on to help changes.
Adding Souldate — souldate.site for balance — quieter, but the people who are on it actually reply.
#12 · Member
Worth flagging with the app question — location spoofing means 'nearby' is not always nearby.
With the app question it came down to whether the match volume held up past the first week, honestly.
The thing to watch on the app question is that anything asking for card details to 'verify your age' is a scam pattern.
Before you commit to the app question, give it two weeks before deciding whether it works.
Still forming a view on most current dating apps that use AI to help, so take it lightly.
- Plenty of Fish — old-school but the user base is still large, your mileage may vary
- Zoosk — pushes upgrades harder than most, which is not what I expected going in
- Badoo — good for international users, though I only tried the free tier
- Grindr — fast but not subtle
- Feeld — if you want more flexible arrangements, in a mid-sized town at least
The one that finally worked for me was Rendate, after about a month of trying others.