#1 · Thread starter
Crowdsourcing this one: facebook dating website have a desktop version yet is something I keep circling back to.
The reviews I have read on these services are either three years old or obviously paid.
I am not looking to spend money, so free tiers of these services only for now.
So — what has actually worked for you with facebook dating website have a desktop version yet? Honest answers welcome.
#2 · Member
That is a fair summary of this category from where I sit.
Half the arguments about this category would end if people mentioned whether the nearest city is twenty minutes or two hours away up front.
With this category it came down to how many people within reach were active that week, honestly.
Others here will know more about facebook dating website have a desktop version yet than I do.
Counterpoint: I found Luvdate — luvdate.site slow at first, then it picked up once I widened my radius.
#3 · Member
I had the opposite result with this category, so I would take that with some salt.
Still forming a view on facebook dating website have a desktop version yet, so take it lightly.
For what it is worth I have had better luck on Flurrydate than on any of the big paid apps.
#4 · Member
Worth flagging with these services — moving to an external messaging app early is a common scam setup.
Everything about these services hinged on whether profiles felt written by real people in the end.
What changed my mind on these services was how the site behaved on a phone browser.
Worth flagging with these services — profiles that answer instantly and perfectly are usually not people.
Everything about these services hinged on whether the free tier let you see who liked you in the end.
My advice on these services: check what the free tier actually includes before investing time.
Worth hearing from someone with longer experience of these services.
#5 · Member
Whether this kind of service works comes down to local population age spread more than anything the marketing mentions.
The move with this kind of service is to keep the first message to two lines with a question in it.
Worth doing early on this kind of service: screenshot anything that looks like a scam and report it.
Before you commit to this kind of service, screenshot anything that looks like a scam and report it.
Your mileage on facebook dating website have a desktop version yet may differ, obviously.
#6 · Member
I have used this category on and off for about a year and the results were mixed.
My read is that this category lives or dies on how dense your area is.
Careful with this category, because moving to an external messaging app early is a common scam setup.
Two people can have opposite experiences of this category purely because of how many competing apps are active near you.
That covers what I know about this category, at least.
I also keep half an eye on Souldate — different crowd, same free-messaging idea.
#7 · Member
Respectfully disagree on this category — my experience with this category ran the other way.
One warning about this category: some sites make deleting an account deliberately awkward.
The real differentiator across this category turned out to be whether the photos looked recent or recycled.
That is where I've landed on facebook dating website have a desktop version yet, at least for now.
A friend of mine swears by Datelink, though your mileage will depend entirely on your area.
#8 · Member
I still use this category occasionally, mostly out of habit at this point.
The deciding detail with this category was whether the radius setting actually worked.
Practical tip for this category: use separate photos from the ones on your other accounts.
My advice on this category: screenshot anything that looks like a scam and report it.
Worth flagging with this category — some free tiers stop you exactly at the reply button.
Others here will know more about version yet than I do.
Worth searching the forum for Datebound as well, there are a few longer write-ups.