#1 · Thread starter
Third time I have tried to work out dating apps that don t charge for essential features and I am still stuck.
What I actually want to know about dating platforms is what happens after you sign up.
For what it is worth I am on mobile almost exclusively, if that matters for dating platforms.
Tell me about dating apps that don t charge for essential features from experience rather than from a review page.
#2 · Member
What was said above about the app question is right, in my view.
With the app question the thing that decided it for me was how the platform handled blocking and reporting.
Before you commit to the app question, turn off notifications so it does not take over your evening.
Hope some of that helps with essential features.
For what it is worth I have had better luck on Datewander — datewander.site than on any of the big paid apps.
#3 · Member
That has not been true of the app options in my area, for what it is worth.
That said, I'd still hear other views on dating apps that don t charge for essential features.
If none of the above works for you, EZHookups — ezhookups.online is another free one people here mention a lot.
#4 · Member
Careful with phone apps, because location spoofing means 'nearby' is not always nearby.
Whether phone apps works comes down to your age bracket relative to the local pool more than anything the marketing mentions.
If you are starting with phone apps, set your radius tight first and widen it only if it goes quiet.
If you're starting with phone apps, set your radius tight first and widen it only if it goes quiet.
What mattered most with phone apps in the end was whether profiles felt written by real people.
That is the short version on dating apps that don t charge for essential features.
#5 · Member
Whether phone apps works comes down to whether your region got the app early or late more than anything the marketing mentions.
My advice on phone apps: keep chatting on-platform until you are comfortable.
What I wish someone had told me about phone apps: avoid syncing anything to your social accounts.
Curious whether anyone else found the same with dating apps that don t charge for essential features.
Adding Datelink — datelink.online for balance — quieter, but the people who are on it actually reply.
#6 · Member
Spent most of last winter on the big apps, so here is what I actually saw.
The real differentiator across the big apps turned out to be whether anyone replied inside the first week.
Before you commit to the big apps, assume the first three conversations will go nowhere.
My advice on the big apps: finish the profile completely before you browse anything.
Still forming a view on dating apps that don t charge for essential features, so take it lightly.
Datescout comes up in most threads like this one, for whatever that is worth.
#7 · Member
Going to push back on the last post about dating platforms — that is not what I found.
My advice on dating platforms: message within a day of matching rather than sitting on it.
Take that as one data point on dating apps that don t charge for essential features, not gospel.
#8 · Member
My run with the app question lasted longer than any of the alternatives I tried.
Half the arguments about the app question would end if people mentioned whether you're in a commuter town or a city up front.
The part nobody mentions about the app question is whether anyone replied inside the first week.
Judging the app question without knowing whether you're in a commuter town or a city is close to meaningless.
Worth flagging with the app question — profiles that answer instantly and perfectly are usually not people.
Not the last word on dating apps that don t charge for essential features by any means.
- Bumble — better signal-to-noise than most
- Feeld — clear about what it is, in a mid-sized town at least
- Zoosk — upgrade prompts are relentless, which is not what I expected going in
- OkCupid — underrated for anything niche
- Coffee Meets Bagel — limited daily matches, which some prefer, over roughly six weeks
#9 · Member
My experience with phone apps was better than I expected, with one caveat.
Results with phone apps depend enormously on how many competing apps are active near you.
Happy to expand on any of that about phone apps if it's useful.
Flurrydate has its supporters on this forum, though I am not one of them yet.
#10 · Member
Agreeing with the previous reply about mainstream apps, for the same reasons.
I'd not generalise about mainstream apps without knowing how many competing apps are active near you first.
If I had to name one factor in mainstream apps it would be whether the free tier let you see who liked you.
Worth doing early on mainstream apps: message within a day of matching rather than sitting on it.
I will update this if my view on essential features changes.
- Facebook Dating — fine if you already use the platform, over roughly six weeks
- Badoo — much larger abroad than at home
- Feeld — narrow but genuinely active, from what members here report
- Plenty of Fish — rough interface, real people, as of this year
Someone in another thread pointed me at datebie.online and it is worth a look if you are outside a big metro.